Recent Trends in Archaeological Theory: Some Comments

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Dept of Anthropology Northwestern University

Abstract

This paper is a selective review of some recent themes in archaeological theory since c.2000. It deals first with a philosophical pragmatism and its application to archaeological thought and practice. The paper then examines a turn to materiality, sometimes glossed as an ‘ontological turn’, and its implications for different aspects of theory and practice. Thirdly, the paper discusses the understanding the past in the context of the present and the need for archaeology to maintain and extend its engagement with issues of diversity. The argument of the paper concludes with some reflective comments on the author’s Archaeological Theory:  An Introduction, first published in 1999, in advance of the third revised edition. Two key themes in this reflection are first, issues arising from a pluralism and democracy of interpretation, and second, the tension between a generalizing survey of ‘world archaeology’ and the need to acknowledge and develop perspectives situated within diverse local contexts.

Keywords


Andrews, G.; J.C. Barrett & J.S,C. Lewis2000 Interpretation not record: the practice of arch-aeology. Antiquity 74: 525-30.
Atalay, S.2006 Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing prac-tice.American Indian Quarterly 30, 280-310.Baert, P.
2005 Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge, Polity.
Bruchac, M.2010 Lost and found: NAGPRA, scattered relics,and restorative methodologies. Museum Anth-ropology 33, 137-156.
Buchli, V. & G. Lucas (eds)2002 Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. Lon-don, Routledge.
Chadwick, A.2003 Post-processualism, professionalisation and archaeological methodologies: towards reflex-ive and radical practice. Archaeological Dialo-gues 10, 97-117.
Cobb, C.2014 The once and future archaeology. American Antiquity 79:4, 589-595.
Conkey, M.W.2005 Dwelling at the margin, action at the intersecti-on? Feminist and indigenous archaeologies, Archaeologies 1:1, 9-59.
2007 Questioning theory: is there a gender of theory in archaeology? Journal of Archaeological me- thod and Theory 14, 285-310.
Cooper, C.2014 The exploration of lived experience in late me-dieval buildings through the use of digital tech-nologies. Unpublished PhD, available electr-onically at http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/377916/.
Coudart, A.1999 Why is there no post-processual archaeology in France? Antiquity 73, 161-167.
Matt Edgeworth.2011 Excavation as a ground of archaeological knowledge. Archaeological Dialogues, 18, pp
44-46. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000109.
Gell, A.1998 Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford, Clarendon. Gramsch, A. & U. Sommer (eds)
2011 A History of Central European Archaeology: Theories, Methods, Politics. Budapest : Archaeolingua Alapítvány. Harris, E.C.
1989 Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Se-cond edition. London, Academic Press.
Harris, O.2016 Becoming post-human: identity and the ontological turn. In Campbell, L., Maldona- do, A., Pirece, E. and Russell, A. (eds) Creati-ng Material Worlds: The Uses of Identity in Archaeology. Oxford, Oxbow. Harvey, K. (ed.)
2009 History and Material Culture: A Student’s Guide to Appproaching Alternative Sources. London, Routledge.
Heywood, P. 2012 Anthropology and what there is: reflections on ‘ontology’. Cambridge Anthropology 31, 143-151.
Hodder, I. 2012 Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relations- hip Between Humans and Things. Oxford, Blackwell.
Holtorf, C. 2009 A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant archaeologies. World Archaeolog- y 41:4, 672-681.
Ingold, T. 2007 Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14:1, 1-16.
2010 Footprints through the weather-world: walki-ng, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16, 121-139.
Ingold, T. and Vergunst, J.L. (eds) 2016 Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot. London, Routledge.
James, W. 2008 (first published 1907) Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Rockvi- lle, Arc Manor
Johnson, M.H. 1999 Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Fir- st edition. Oxford, Blackwell.
2007 Ideas of Landscape. Oxford, Blackwell.
2010 Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Se- cond edition. Oxford, Blackwell.
2011 On the nature of empiricism in archaeology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17, 764-787.
Jones, A. & B. Alberti (eds) 2013 Archaeology After Interpretation. London,Routledge.
Kintigh, Keith; Jeffrey. Altschul; Mary. Beaudry; Robert.Drennan; Ann. Kinzig; Timothy. Kohler; W. Frederick.Limp; Herbert. Maschner; William. Michener; Timothy.Pauketat; Peter. Peregrine; Jeremy. Sabloff; Tony
Wilkinson; Henry. Wright & Melinda. Zeder2014 Grand challenges for archaeology. AmericanAntiquity 79:1, 5-24.
Lucas, G.2012 Understanding the Archaeological Record.Cambridge University Press.
2015 The mobility of theory. Swedish Archaeolog-ical Review 23, 13-32.
Lutz, C.1995 The gender of theory. In Behar, R. and Gord-on, D. (eds) Women Writing Culture. Berke-ley, University of California Press
Marshall, Y. (ed.)2002 What is community archaeology?. Special issue, World Archaeology 34: 2, 211-219.
Miller, D. (ed.)2005 Materiality. Durham, Duke University Press.
Misak, Cheryl. (ed.)2007 The New Pragmatists. Oxford, Clarendon.
Misak, C.2013 The American Pragmatists. Oxford, OxfordUniversity Press.
Perry, S. & N. Beale2015 The social web and archaeology’s restructur-ing: impact, exploitation, disciplinary chan-ge. Open Archaeology 1, 153-165.
Preucel, R. & S. Mrozowski (eds)2010 Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: TheNew Pragmatism. Second edition.Oxford,Blackwell.
Rorty, R.1999 Philosophy and Social Hope. Harmondswo-rth, Penguin.
Shanks, M. & R.H. Mcguire1996 The craft of archaeology. American Antiqu-ity 61:1, 75-88.
Shanks, M. & C. Tilley1987 Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory andPractice. Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, J.2000 Ayodhya’s sacred landscape: ritual memory,politics and archaeological ‘fact’. Antiquity74, 693-700.
Smith, A.T.2004 The end of the essential archaeological subje-ct. Archaeological Dialogues 11:1, 1-20.
Sofaer, J.2006 The Body as Material Culture. Cambridge University Press.
Sommer, U.2000 Theory and tradition in German archaeology.Archaeological Dialogues 7, 160-168.
Trigger, B.G.2006 A History of Archaeological Thought. Secondedition. Cambridge University Press.
Weismantel, M.forthcoming. Cuni Raya Superhero: Ontologiesof Water on Peru’s North Coast. In Swenson,E. and Jennings, J. (eds)Place, Landscape, an-d Power in the Ancient Andes.
West, C.1989 The American Evasion of Philosophy: AGenealogy of Pragmatism. Madison, Univer-sity of Wisconsin Press.
Wilcox, M.2010 NAGPRA and Indigenous Peoples: The Soc-ial Context, Controversies and the Transfor-mation of American Archaeology” in Voices of American Archaeology: 75th Anniversaryo-f the SAA, SAA Press, Wendy Ashmore, Dor-othy Lippert, Barbara Mills Editors.
Wylie, A.2000 Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the(dis)unity of science, American Antiquity65:2, 227-237.
2003 Why standpoint matters. In Figueroa, R., Ha-rding, S. and Harding, S.G. (eds) Science andOther Cultures: Issues in Philosophy in Scie-nce and Technology, London, Routledge,26-48.